<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Church IT - Supporting ministry with IT &#187; OpenSong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churchit.co.uk/category/opensong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churchit.co.uk</link>
	<description>Supporting ministry with IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:40:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Isn&#8217;t XML brilliant?</title>
		<link>http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/05/isnt-xml-brilliant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/05/isnt-xml-brilliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchit.co.uk/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not normally given to extolling the virtues of a plain technology, what you can do with it is much more important. But I think an exception might be in order. If you&#8217;ve not heard of XML it stands for eXtensible Markup Language, and if that sounds similar to HTML, the language of the web, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not normally given to extolling the virtues of a plain technology, what you can do with it is much more important. But I think an exception might be in order.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve not heard of XML it stands for eXtensible Markup Language, and if that sounds similar to HTML, the language of the web, you&#8217;d be right. XML is designed to be more flexible as you can define what XML is used for, so it is equally at home handling a home CD collection, or organising songs in OpenSong.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s my link to what you can do with it. The creators of <a title="The OpenSong Homepage" href="http://www.opensong.org/" target="_self">OpenSong</a> decided to use XML for the songs, which was a very good decision in my opinion. Someone  on the OpenSong forums asked if it is possible to convert songs to Word or PDF. Actually conversion isn&#8217;t strictly speaking necessary because Word can open the files without any extra help. Well, baring renaming the files to songname.xml because the OpenSong files don&#8217;t have a file extension. One small detail I would change.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just Word either, <a title="The OpenOffice homepage" href="http://www.openoffice.org" target="_blank">OpenOffice Writer</a> opened the song too. In fact in some respects slightly better because the XML tags are represented as plain text so a simple find and replace macro will remove them.</p>
<p>So why the praise for XML? Well, because of the way it was created it is possible for two programs (OK three OpenSong, Word and Writer &#8211; I&#8217;m lumping the latter two together) to share information without any kind of modification. Even if they couldn&#8217;t, because XML is text based it&#8217;s human readable. In theory at least, though OpenSong files are very clear and easy to read.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s a great format in my opinion, and one that I hope thrives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/05/isnt-xml-brilliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playing to the same music</title>
		<link>http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/04/playing-to-the-same-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/04/playing-to-the-same-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TimSmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/04/playing-to-the-same-music/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As it was an All Age Worship (family) service this morning, I was operating OpenSong as well as the mixer.&#160; Generally quite straightforward as there isn&#8217;t too much to have to react to, apart from some swapping around of radio mics. The only snag was at the end of the service when the words I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it was an All Age Worship (family) service this morning, I was operating <a href="http://www.opensong.org/">OpenSong</a> as well as the mixer.&#160; Generally quite straightforward as there isn&#8217;t too much to have to react to, apart from some swapping around of radio mics.</p>
<p>The only snag was at the end of the service when the words I had entered for &#8216;The Spirit Lives to set us free&#8217; turned out to be different from those in the hands of the singers. Luckily we have a second monitor that points towards the music group so they were able to switch to that without any problems.</p>
<p>Being a techie I find myself casting around for a solution that involves some form of electronic wizardry. Perhaps it is time to push harder for internet access in the church.&#160; Then we could have a central place to store information about the service.</p>
<p>Another solution is to run through the service in more detail (or indeed at all) before Sunday, as per the excellent advice to be found in the podcasts of <a href="http://www.creativesynergypodcast.com/">Creative Synergy</a>. As much as I agree however, it is harder for a small parish church with a limited headcount.</p>
<p>Perhaps this also inspires a feature request for OpenSong. A portable version would allow me to carry it around on a USB key so I would always know exactly what is on the notebook. Part of the problem was the service organiser had looked on the notebook for the words but I had copied them straight from Junior Praise that included an extra verse.</p>
<p>Of course, as OpenSong is opensource, there&#8217;s no reason for me not to have a go myself, perhaps it&#8217;s time to stop just lurking in the forum.</p>
<p> Then again, maybe I&#8217;m dwelling too much on the negative. It was only one song, and the rest of the service went without any problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.churchit.co.uk/2008/04/playing-to-the-same-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
